Posted on

Bottom Up Success

By Randal Adcock
The Journey | Sorting out the causes of business success/failure in so far as Small & Medium Sized Enterprises go, is not easy. Whether you’re looking into the reasons for success or failure, the causes are of the same sort. If you can address the problems leading to failure then you have a success. If you fail to address the causes of success then you are likely to fail. One thing to address up front is attitude.

Positive Attitude | Your attitude is most important for success. Studies in psychology show that a good degree of optimism makes you more creative. There is no success without first believing in your success. Think back on all your successes to date. These are your assets going forward. You are a goal-oriented problem-solver!

Framing | Rather than asking “how do I avoid failure?” ask “how do I succeed?”. This
may be true even when facing impending failure. Doubts have a way of shutting down
creative problem-solving. Don’t be overwhelmed or you’ll face a tendency to give up.
A bit of self-deception can be constructive. No matter what opportunities and challenges
you face, you will first face them with familiar lenses. We need to develop constructive
habits, making a conscious effort to be a bit more positive when you wake up in the
morning and prepare for your day. Last thing at night, remind yourself of how grateful you
are for the blessings of the day. Even if you had a bad day, focus on the positive and
you’ll get better at it. Attitude frames everything.

Capacities | It is also important to distribute your assets, efforts/time in a way that
sufficiently covers all your business requirements. The word sufficient is key; you
don’t have to use some mathematical optimization algorithm to get the distribution
perfect. You will never get it perfect. You just need to cover requirements sufficiently to
get the job done. What does the job need?

Essentials | Have enough cash in the bank to cover expenses; enough paying customers; set prices high enough to cover product costs plus admin costs; hire enough human resources to get the work done; pay them well enough to keep them around long as they’re needed (and back again); make a product that people want at a price they’re prepared to pay; share your vision sufficiently with your people so they can work with you effectively; respect people and the fact that they all have something different to offer; build lasting and trusting relationships so your transactions become easy and automatic; explore new options routinely and remain somewhat open-minded and inquisitive.

Learning | Learning takes place in goal-plan-action-review cycles. The loop involves continuous goal-setting, planning, action, results, and a review that produces lessons for the next round. Take the time to prepare a solid business plan, implement it, track outcomes and repeat the process in a positive feedback loop of continuous improvement – from bottom to the top.

Business Plan | The plan is key part of your learning loop and is often overlooked. Some research shows that a business plan has questionable value for a brand new business because the plan will likely change quite a bit at fist. But you need to plan. Writing the plan forces you to think things through and minimize the things you might miss. Understanding comes at the point of articulation. Keep in mind that not all entrepreneurs are the same. Some naturally learn more in the action part of the cycle. This is okay as long as the failures along the way are bite-sized and manageable. Prepare a sufficiently comprehensive yet detailed plan to get all your team onboard, including the bank and investors. Plan sections: mission, vision, goals and strategy; market research, products, operations, human resources and finance.

Scaling | Many businesses fail when they try to grow to fast. Others avoid trying because scaling up is different, and sometimes more risky, than getting established. In some industries, however, competition demands that you reach a certain size and economy of scale in order to offer competitive prices and product range. You may need to grow. However, as your business grows you need to scale your plans/processes in proportion to requirements. It isn’t just about increasing output with your existing setup. Build a set of tools that make sense for the level of complexity you need to manage. It starts with foundations. Often, getting a bookkeeper is an early first step in small business. You learn how to assign tasks to others. Then maybe outsource marketing, etc. To really scale up you need to hire managers and learn to let go of everyday details.

Failure & Success | The causes of business success and failure are interdependent. One could use the Five+Why approach. Ask ‘why?’ to at least five consecutive answers to the initial question of “why did the initiative fail?”… For example; there’s not enough cash coming in: 1) Why? A: Not enough customers. 2) Why? A: Not enough promotion. 3) Why? A: Not enough cash to purchase promotion. 4) Why? A: Didn’t invest enough. 5) Why? A: Investors were not confident. 6) Why? A: Didn’t have a detailed business plan. Solution — work on your plan!

As for the study of success, it may not be enough to look at a business success and say “they didn’t make any mistakes”. What did they actually do when they faced opportunities and when they faced threats?

Bottom Up | Sorting out the causes of business success and failure is not easy.
Address the common problems leading to failure then you probably have a success. Fail to address the causes of success, then you are likely to fail. Remind yourself of this basic understanding, consult trusted opinion-makers, adjust your plans accordingly, and you will  propel upward your chances of success! ©

About: Randal Adcock is the co-founder & chair of Wayfinders Business Cooperative ©

Posted on

KING’S UNIVERSITY & WAYFINDERS COOPERATIVE COLLABORATION.

KING’S UNIVERSITY > FACULTY of BUSINESS | You will be pleased to know that soon, we’ll be involved with King’s University Faculty of Business and their Community Engaged Research https://www.kingsu.ca/programs/additional-academics/cer (CER) Program. This program builds upon the research capacities of community partners by supporting important initiatives – in this case, Wayfinders Business Cooperative.

Through CER + 3 students assigned to us, we’ll be exploring key areas, such as sustainability of cooperatives; best practices of cooperatives, best practices of emerging platform cooperatives (such as ourselves) and our constantly evolving business model/plan. This initiative starts in early 2019; of course, we’ll be sharing findings as it goes along. We thank our friend and colleague David Long, faculty at King’s University for his interest in our endeavour; the CER Program which he leads & the people at Faculty of Business. – LCA

Posted on

Online Vendors Workshop

Welcome Wayfinders and Friends:

This is a workshop to work through how to set up a vendor account and space on the Wayfinders Commerce website and to share ideas on how to improve the site.
Come if you want to explore the feasibility of setting up a vendor account. Its good for selling services as well as products, downloadable products, or booking time (e.g. coaching, lessons) and meeting space. In fact, we’re exploring ways to turn it into a supply chain management system with a smart search engine.

Bring a friend who may be interested in selling online.

Come if you’re just curious. The first part will be a general orientation.

London Drugs has set up a workshop room that is open to the public, with a large screen TV and chairs with desktops so you can use your device. The room is booked. We can manage up 16 people.

An RSVP to this invitation would be appreciated.
This should be quite exciting!

Randal

Our trial commerce site:

https://test.wayfindersbusinesscooperative.com/commerce/

Posted on

Meetup Monday

Meetup Monday, November 19th

Ricky’s All Day Grill

Jasper Avenue and 109 Street

6 PM to 7:30 PM

Lots of free parking space

What happens:

  • Updates
  • Sharing
  • Networking
  • Learning

We want to know what you want from a business co-operative:

  • Collective buying power
  • Online services – blogs, communities of practice
  • Cloud file storage, project management and collaboration
  • Online commerce platform
  • Software as a Service
  • Live Face to Face Local Chapter Clubs
  • Democratic governance

How important are these to you?

What are we missing?

More on Meetup and to register:

Introducing Wayfinders Business Co-operative for the small businesss community

Monday, Nov 19, 2018, 6:00 PM

Ricky’s All Day Grill
10140 109th St, Edmonton Edmonton, al

6 Members Went

We’ll quickly tell you about Wayfinders Business Co-operative and its benefits for the self-employed, entrepreneurs and freelancers — and we’ll ask you how we can serve you. We are an early stage small business community that will operate like an ecosystem. Owned and operated by its members, Wayfinders is building a web platform of software servic…

Check out this Meetup →

Posted on

Journey to Success: Women in Business with Arti Mittal

Journey to Success: Women in Business

Arti Mittal

Nov. 16, 2018, 10:00 to 12:00 noon at The Business Link, Suite #500, 10150-100 St.

Downtown Edmonton – admission $5.00 donation.

Join us for an engaging conversation with Arti Mittal, owner of Lola’s Fashions. Loala’s Fashions is a unique, one of a kind boutique in Edmonton excelling in superb customer service and treating our fashionistas like real divas. Arti loves fashion and worked in a number of retail stores before opening her own.

CHALLENGES | After immigrating to Canada over 30 years ago, Arti’s hard work, dedication, perseverance and visionary commitment as an entrepreneur have been essential elements for her professional pathways to success. She will share with us her tips, pointers and solid advise not only for women entrepreneurs but for men as well, no matter where you come from.

Please RSVP by Nov. 15, 2018 to: leocamposa@gmail.com (or) Tel: 780.474.6058. SPONSORED by: Wayfinders Business Cooperative©

Posted on

Must Read: How the Enlightenment Ends

How the Enlightenment Ends

From The Atlantic

Philosophically, intellectually—in every way—human society is unprepared for the rise of artificial intelligence.
Henry A. Kissinger
Three years ago, at a conference on transatlantic issues, the subject of artificial intelligence appeared on the agenda. I was on the verge of skipping that session—it lay outside my usual concerns—but the beginning of the presentation held me in my seat.
The speaker described the workings of a computer program that would soon challenge international champions in the game Go. I was amazed that a computer could master Go, which is more complex than chess. In it, each player deploys 180 or 181 pieces (depending on which color he or she chooses), placed alternately on an initially empty board; victory goes to the side that, by making better strategic decisions, immobilizes his or her opponent by more effectively controlling territory…… As I listened to the speaker celebrate this technical progress, my experience as a historian and occasional practicing statesman gave me pause. What would be the impact on history of self-learning machines—machines that acquired knowledge by processes particular to themselves, and applied that knowledge to ends for which there may be no category of human understanding? Would these machines learn to communicate with one another? How would choices be made among emerging options? Was it possible that human history might go the way of the Incas, faced with a Spanish culture incomprehensible and even awe-inspiring to them? Were we at the edge of a new phase of human history? …
more:
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/06/henry-kissinger-ai-could-mean-the-end-of-human-history/559124/

Posted on

Talk about Agile and Organic Action!

Life is full!

How do we make time to make progress against those things that are not urgent but potentially extremely important for all of us?

As the pace of life accelerates we find ourselves ever-more deeply entrenched in routines punctuated with more frequent distractions.  Attention spans are shrinking.  The scope of strategic perspectives is narrowing. I don’t know… maybe its just me?

So how do we get into a meaningful conversation about the big issues like the ethical questions surrounding AI?

Those of us who enjoy trying to wrap our heads around such issues often struggle to find time with other patient thinkers to sort out the many complicated ins and out of these emerging issues. If you don’t make much progress it gets discouraging.

A subject like the civil impacts of AI are linked to not only the accelerating pace of disruptive technology that is AI in its many manifestations, but also simultaneously emerging technologies of blockchain, the internet of things, and the cloud, not to mention the continuous creep of well established software into all aspects of the modern workplace.

But add to this the complexities of the economy (is it the knowledge economy, sharing economy, the gig economy?) The whole idea of automation is to displace human labour and or improve on it. And add to this the politics of economics – who is going to acquire power by owning AI? Will power and influence be evenly distributed? Will large AI-based companies get an early advantage and concentrate control over wider public access to AI? AI has the potential to scale quickly and easily.

Add to this the social and cultural aspects of modern life. Are kids growing up exposed to a healthy variety of life experiences? Will they grow up and into healthy relationships? Who decides how much exposure to video games and social media is good or bad? We don’t even have consistent reliable data for longitudinal analysis.

Enter the Conversation

Much has been said lately about the advantages of a cluster of smart methods, such as lean management, agile project management, rapid prototyping and so on. What can we learn from these methods to help us start a conversation on big complex issues like AI and its implications?

Many people lament the loss of traditional friendship and community. Some people may have missed the departure while others may still be clinging to it faithfully. Some have managed to avoid the trappings of social media but are like outcasts, luddites, living in the past. I hope our social instincts can still carry us to a revival.

Each new technology, fad or fashion, has its cycle yet also leaves a legacy. Over the past 25 years of the web our society has changed dramatically in some ways. Social media and the pace of disruptive technologies in general have fundamentally altered the civil cadence. Even prominent authors admit they no longer read much. As their brains have been tapped out on textual information they now prefer video and audio productions.

When I first invited people to participate in an open forum, I was thinking about something more formal than conversation, such as a systems and design workshop. The subject matter of AI and its ethical implications is intense and complex and it would demand some serious methodologies to wrestle with them and to pin down the issues.

Then I talked with Ken Chapman over drink’s at Perry’s Seance (Chateau Louis Friday PM).  He said we should take a more casual approach at first and let it evolve. I was reminded of the agile, lean and prototyping approaches to new product innovation. It made a lot of sense. Much has been done on strategic, systems and design thinking, but this approach is more like a collaboration method. It builds team conversation capacity.

A few years ago we had a fad variously called “philosopher’s cafes” or “conversation cafes“. We now have the “un-conference“. What is happening may be a bite-sizing of conversations. Can we start a simple conversation on weighty issues by simply setting a time and place and a topic? I think so. In fact, I am thinking it has to start there.

There is something compelling about starting with something as natural as a conversation over coffee.  Are there rules? Probably, but simple ones that make intuitive sense. Is there a goal? Yes, but a general one. We don’t necessarily have, or need to start with a clear and distinct idea of where the conversation will lead. Will it make a difference? If people who participate feel they have a better sense of how the issues play out then that may be enough. Other people may be emboldened to strive for more than mere understanding.

Forward

Where can this go?  We can explore and pivot, bring many backgrounds to the game, and see what happens with as little effort as a conversation takes. How can we lose? Stay tuned for next steps as you and others add your thoughts to this forum. I think we will be seeing each other in person soon.


“Whatever you can do, or dream you can do, begin it. Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it. Begin it now.“

Posted on

The race is on. “The future of work” is but one dimension…

Reposted from Perry Kinkaide

https://futurism.com/images/age-automation-welcome-next-great-revolution/

The race is on. “The future of work” is but one dimension of any discussion of the impact of AI as a positive and/or negative force on everything, everywhere now and into the future. Parallels in history are the advent of anything that advanced knowledge and it’s spread from the alphabet to the printing press from political to educational institutions, from the wheel to the computer, from the advent of money to the creation of the internet.
At a recent seance #1-2018, we discussed “triage”, the design of an algorithm for deciding how to decide winning and losing in an accident. Various scenarios were considered and each surfaced a different set of ethics.
An over-riding assumption was that the driver – an AI agent, had access to all knowledge and the entire environment including the history of any other agents or people involved. It would for example be able to triage what/who to save and may therefore be able to mitigate the loss of any preprogrammed value(s).

First, some argued that AI agents would never have an accident. The counter was that in our universe, there is always some element of uncertainty. Therefore, no AI agent could ever argue or should ever argue that “certainty” is guaranteed; while striving to “do no harm” to humans, accidents will happen. Triage is a scenario where a decision has to be made between conflicting options.One scenario pitted AI agents in conflict with one another. Winning was the default; dominance the over-riding consideration. This was rejected as valuing size, strength, smarts, and even wealth, leading to road rage and escalated violence.

As for minimizing costs or lives lost, scenarios were envisioned that dismissed these as “default” values. Does the child or the Nobel prize winner get saved, the bus or the cyclist, the AI agent or the pedestrian, the entrepreneur or the musician?

One intriguing – but also rejected default, was to program the agent to maneuver in such a way as to learn the most. This option emerged when it was posed that the AI agent be programmed to decide on it’s own, that is, for it to derive a value set that it respects that may or may not at the time be perceived by humans as good, just or rational.

The AI agent over time would learn to avoid an accident regardless of it’s impact. “Learning” as a process would be the default; any annomolies would be justified and tolerated as contributing to a better future.

Other options were: 1. to allow the public to adjuducate or 2. designate and appeal to a  “god AI – the supreme agent, to resolve a conflict. Each was rejected as avoiding the question of how to decide.

Another was to “avoid risk” at a predetermined level. This was viewed as irrelevant to the discussion, as a condition of the discussion was how to act in a situation of triage, where an accident was anticipated or had occured and a choice was required.
Ultimately – and there was no consensus, the most ethical option was to let the accident occur and “learn” what had occured, thereby minimizing a future occurance. This option was valued as in the “public” interest meaning, the default was that public not private interests prevailed.

An interesting observation is that the value of  “public” interests varied by culture as reflected in say autocratic vs democratic regimes. Some argued that strict adherence to public interests would ultimately suppress and contain personal initiative and innovation that was in conflict with public interests. They  argued that the foundation of democracy was to mediate and value as equal public and private interests. The algorithm should have no inherent bias one way or the other.

How AI develops in China and the US may differ widely; but the race is on. The development of AI may forment conflict between public/social and private/personal interests inside and between cultures.

Looking ahead, as the public/private conflict rages interests ofvthe AI agent may emerge that over-ride both public and private interests. That is, people would be trumped by an AI agent(s). Over time independent AI agents would elect to organize for protecting their individual and collective interests. The form of that “organization” can only be imagined but they would have the history of mankind to draw on for shortening their journey to wherever.

The exercise revealed a great deal about ethics and values, public and private conflict.

Posted on

How to Create Collective Intelligence

Among many other thoughts on AI and its civil impacts, I believe we have to master our natural collective (civil or organizational) intelligence if we are going to manage AI and other complex issues in the mid to long term. We can see a couple of steps are involved.

The first step on this road is to become aware of our existing collective intelligence. We are in fact embedded in human collective intelligence, but it takes a bit of reflection to become fully aware of this and to understand how it works. Most of the time we take it for granted. When it fails we usually just start arguing and pointing fingers of blame. There is more to it.

The second step will be to practice the improvement of collective intelligence in group activities such as facilitated workshops like systems and design thinking or strategic foresight. Then it will demand some effort to master its optimization in groups, organizations and communities.

Below is a link to an article from Evonomics concerning collective intelligence and how to support it.  I don’t agree with everything put forth but there is much value in the discussion regardless. This is an important newly emerging discipline that draws on evolutionary biology, psychology, behavioural economics, anthropology and more.


” As soon as we associate “mind” with “unit of selection”, then the possibility of human group minds leaps into view. It is becoming widely accepted that our distant ancestors found ways to suppress disruptive self-serving behaviors within their groups, so that cooperating as a group became the primary evolutionary force.“…

The question that animated me was a version of this: why do some nations, cities, organisations manage to thrive and adapt while others don’t, even though they appear to be endowed with superior intellectual resources or technologies?  Why did some of the organizations that had invested the most in intelligence of all kinds – from firms like Lehmann Brothers to the USSR in the 1980s – fail to spot big facts in the world around them and so stumble? ” – Geoff Mulgan


Enjoy!

Randal

Article:
http://evonomics.com/how-to-creative-collective-intelligence-david-wilson-mulgan/

Posted on

AMANDA KNIGHT: Leadership in the 21st Century and the Role of Women

Talk with AMANDA KNIGHT

Leadership in the 21st Century and the Role of Women

Friday October 26, 2018

As change unfolds rapidly within our local, national & international economies, so do shifts in gender roles, power, influence and decision-making. In the mix, women of all backgrounds, professions & stations in life, are asking – where do we fit in the “new economy?” Join us for an engaging conversation on these stirring issues.

Image may contain: 1 person, smiling, eyeglasses, closeup and outdoor

About:

Amanda Knight is passionate about creating great workplace cultures by helping leaders recognize that leadership is a privilege, not a right, and that non-judgment is the new leadership capability essential for limiting bias and for encouraging inclusion.

Location: Orange Room at The Business Link, Suite #500, 10150 – 100 St. | Time: 10:00 am. – 12:00 noon | Admission: a $5.00 donation is welcomed.

RSVP by October 24 to: leocamposa@gmail.com or 780.474.6058.

Or complete and submit the following:

How many will attend?(required)

TALK SPONSORED by: Wayfinders Business Cooperative